L.A. Noire - What are the mechanics of the interrogation algorithm?

The interrogations have you start with clues, then evidence, so one starting question cascades into several possible questions to get the answer to the starting question. So do you get the question right if you get the right combination of clues and evidence to answer the starting question with? There's also the Truth/Doubt/Lie part. How does that determine what clues you're supposed to answer for? I find this interrogation process pretty frustrating because it's hard to tell exactly what your answer is supposed to say based on the things you choose. If I select "Partner's whereabouts > Stolen car" in response to a Lie accusation, does that mean I'm saying they know their partner's whereabouts because a car was stolen, does it mean you believe the partner stole the car, or is there some other way to interpret what that means? If I do this in repsonse to declaring something as true, am I just choosing a new question to talk about, or is there a "right" order to selecting your lines of questioning? submitted by /u/EdwardTimeHands [link] [comments]
http://dlvr.it/SMdCdB